Rep. Jim Jordan: "If John Bolton Would Come In It Wouldn't Change Any Of The Underlying Facts" | Video | RealClearPolitics

Rep. Jim Jordan: "If John Bolton Would Come In It Wouldn't Change Any Of The Underlying Facts"

|

Rep. Jim Jordan says the first witness to be called to the Senate impeachment trial should be the whistleblower.

MARTHA MACCALLUM, FOX NEWS: With regard to John Bolton, one of the things that you hammered home during the House side of this process was that all of this is hearsay. But now you have John Bolton saying that he was in the room, that he knows the president’s thinking on this. The president has flatly denied that, says it isn’t true. But how do you get past that?

REP. JIM JORDAN (R-OH): I think we have another example of hearsay. We have someone telling The New York Times what John Bolton’s manuscript supposedly says, and we are supposed to stop the presses and change everything and allowed Democrats to go from a 17-0 witness account to an 18-0 witness count?

MACCALLUM: But that’s exactly the reason that a lot of the witnesses who want John Bolton say, "Okay, let’s bring him in the room and let’s find out the truth."

JORDAN: If John Bolton would come in it wouldn’t change any of the underlying facts.



Comment
Show comments Hide Comments

Latest Political Videos

Video Archives