Rand Paul: There's Nothing That Prevents Me From Saying Whistleblower's Name | Video | RealClearPolitics

Rand Paul: There's Nothing That Prevents Me From Saying Whistleblower's Name

|

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), member of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, joins Bret Baier on Tuesday's 'Special Report' and declared there is no law that prevents him from saying the whistleblower's name.

"There's nothing that prevents me from saying it now, other than that I wanted to be more about the process and less about the person," Paul told Baier. "But there's no law that prevents me from mentioning the name of who's been said to be the whistleblower."





"I think he should be interviewed, not as the whistleblower, but as a material witness to the Biden corruption in Ukraine," Paul said.

BRET BAIER, 'SPECIAL REPORT' HOST: I referenced that tweet moments ago, Andrew Bakaj, the whistleblower's attorney, "If Congress and others do not protect my client's anonymity, which my client is afforded by the law, not only does it jeopardize their safety, but it jeopardizes an entire system that took decades to build.  It will destroy effective Congressional oversight for years to come."  Your response to that?
 
SEN. RAND PAUL (R-KY): You know, I don't wish harm on anyone.  I've been the victim of political violence not once, but twice.  I was there at the ballfield when Steve Scalise was almost killed.  A staff member was 10 feet from me, who was shot.  I had six of my ribs broken by a hater of President Trump.  So, I know what political violence is all about.  I don't want that, at all.  But the report was un -- not correct, in the sense that the statute says the Inspector General can't reveal the name.  It says the president should enforce the law, but the person you quoted was disingenuous in what they were saying.  The statute says the Inspector General can't reveal the name.  There's nothing that prevents me from saying it now, other than that I wanted to be more about the process and less about the person.  But there's no law that prevents me from mentioning the name of who's been said to be the whistleblower.  But there's also –
 
BAIER: But are you convinced you know?
 
PAUL: Yeah.  And there's something important, also.  It's called the Constitution.  The Sixth Amendment to the Constitution says if you are going to accuse me of a crime, I get to stare you down in court.  That is absolutely part of the Constitution.  The statute might say one thing, but, I promise you, if there is a trial, you always get to confront your accuser.  It's in the Sixth Amendment.  It's in the Bill of Rights.  There's no way they can stop –
 
BAIER: Well –
 
PAUL: -- the defense from asking for that.
 
BAIER: -- I don't understand what prevents you from getting on the Senate Floor, where you're protected on –
 
PAUL: Right.
 
BAIER: -- on all kinds of things, and just giving a speech and saying what the guy's name is –
 
PAUL: Right.  I –
 
BAIER: -- if you're convinced you know who it is.
 
PAUL: -- yeah.  No, I can, and I may.  But I can do it right now, if I want.  Nothing stops me.  There is no law that stops me from doing it, other than that I don't want to make it about the one individual.  But I would say this: I do think that this individual is a material witness to the potential Biden corruption.  He was there under Joe Biden.  He was there when Joe Biden was trying to fire the prosecutor that was in -- that was investigating Hunter Biden.  So, this person was a Ukrainian expert on the desk, at that time.  I think he should be interviewed, not as the whistleblower, but as a material witness to the Biden corruption in Ukraine.

Comment
Show comments Hide Comments

Latest Political Videos

Video Archives