MATT LEE, AP: Well, I mean, you use the word â€śconfusion.â€ť The White House just a little while ago, the Deputy National Security Advisor Mr. Blinken was up there and said that he â€“ it was his opinion, and I presume this is the opinion of the Administration, that some of these leaks were either misinformed leaks or they were attempts to misinform. How unhelpful â€“ or how angry are you? How unhelpful do you believe the Israelis, or at least some Israelis have been in this issue? And how angry are you at what you claim to be a serious misrepresentation of what the Secretary was trying to do?
JEN PSAKI, DEPARTMENT OF STATE: Well, I think let me just reiterate first that the Secretaryâ€™s goal is to bring an end from the â€“ to the rocket fire and the rocket attacks coming from Hamas and impacting the people of Israel, and I think thatâ€™s important for everybody to remember. This is, I think weâ€™ve certainly noted, the difference between what is discussed privately and what is noted in public accounts from anonymous sources. And no one is calling to complain about the Secretaryâ€™s handling of the situation or his engagement in this effort overseas. And our view is itâ€™s simply not the way that partners and allies treat each other.
So it was important, in our view, to lay out on the record what the facts are about what has happened here, and weâ€™re certainly hopeful that we can all focus moving forward on how we achieve a ceasefire and not on other misinformation campaigns.
QUESTION: When you say â€“ so you accuse â€“ youâ€™re accusing at least some in the Israeli Government of waging a misinformation campaign? Is that --
MS. PSAKI: I donâ€™t have any information on the sources, Matt.
MS. PSAKI: But obviously thereâ€™s a great deal of information out there thatâ€™s inaccurate.
QUESTION: When you say that this is not the way friends and allies should treat each other, youâ€™re referring to Israeli treatment of Secretary Kerry and of his â€“ of the Administrationâ€™s attempt to get a ceasefire together?
MS. PSAKI: Well, I think there are obviously some anonymous sources that are out there that are speaking on behalf of the views of the Israeli Government. Whether or not that is an accurate depiction of their position is not for me to make a judgment of, but --
QUESTION: So how serious is this, in terms of jeopardizing the relationship?
MS. PSAKI: I donâ€™t think â€“ I think Israel remains an incredibly important partner. The Secretary has been closely engaged in this over the course of the weekend. His â€“ this is not about him, and his view is this is not about him. But I think we all feel that we need to focus on laying out the facts and not undergoing an effort to distort what our effort is focused on here.
QUESTION: The Israeli â€“ the main Israeli â€“ well, there has been a huge chorus of very, very harsh criticism of the Secretary in the Israeli media and in social media as well, claiming â€“ some of it claiming that the Secretary has â€“ is now pro-Hamas and that the only reason that he went into this was to save Hamas. Can you address â€“ the argument goes Hamas was losing militarily, and he comes in and demands an immediate ceasefire, calls for an immediate ceasefire, and then the argument goes that the only reason heâ€™s doing this, the sole reason that heâ€™s doing this, is to save Hamas so that it can live to fight another day, I guess.
MS. PSAKI: Well, thank you for that opportunity, Matt. Iâ€™ll say that the Secretaryâ€™s reason for engaging in this, as he is, is to end the rocket attacks from Hamas that are going into â€“ that have threatened Israel. Thatâ€™s his focus. I think anyone would be hard pressed to find a stronger partner and ally with Israel than Secretary Kerry, not just over the course of the last year in his efforts with the peace process, but the entire time he was in the United States Senate.
But one of the reasons I laid that out in great detail, as I did, is because thereâ€™s a lot of information that is inaccurate about what our efforts were about, what they were focused on. The reason that he engaged with the Qataris and the Turks, who are, of course, countries that we regularly engage with about a range of issues, was because they â€“ but on this particular issue is because they have an influential role to play in engaging with Hamas. You canâ€™t have a ceasefire where Israel agrees to a ceasefire and the other side isnâ€™t agreeing to a ceasefire. That doesnâ€™t help make Israel safer, and thatâ€™s our primary objective.