RealClearPolitics
Advertisement

Debates & Discussions
Clinton Caper: Clinton Behind Edwards 'Love Child' Story?
PoliGazette | Ace of Spades | OTB | Captain's Quarters
Second Tier Surge: Can Fred, Edwards Comeback in Iowa?
Macsmind | Weekly Standard | Unqualified Offerings | The Caucus
Brooks: Obama Could Be a Wise Gamble
Ron Chusid, Liberal Values vs. Chris Bowers, Open Left
Debates & Discussions Archive

Home Page

Religious Tests

Somehow, I don't really buy Harold Meyerson when he cites his concerns over the "Christianization" of the Republican Party. He begins by reminding us that the founders opposed religious tests, but then proceeds to religiously test the Republicans.

Republicans support war and waterboarding, yet oppose immigration, according to Meyerson. This, he'd have us believe, is bad because it's inconsistent with the actual teachings of the Bible.

So would religious tests be appropriate if the GOP was more pious? If the GOP platform were instead a mirror image of the Sermon on the Mount, would that pass muster with Meyerson? My guess is no.

Exit Questions: Is his point then if you impose a religious test, at least pass it? Would the founders approve of that logic?


Others Blogging It:

Stop The ACLU
Matthew Yglesias
Buckeye State Blog
MORE

REAL CLEAR POLITICS AVERAGES
Election 2008RepublicansDemocrats
National
Iowa
New Hampshire
South Carolina
Florida
Charts (D) | Charts (R) | Dem vs. Rep | Latest Polls
Politics & Election 2008 Videos