Top Videos
Related Topics
economy
2008 Polls NationalIowaNew HampshireGeneral Election
GOP | DemGOP | DemGOP | DemHead-to-Head

Send to a Friend | Print Article


The View From the Middle Class

By Robert Samuelson

WASHINGTON -- Almost all Americans see themselves as "middle class.''

To declare yourself middle class is to say you've succeeded without openly bragging that you're superior -- a no-no in a democratic culture. You're like everyone else, only a little more or less so.

Not surprisingly, a recent poll done for the Economic Policy Institute, a liberal think tank, finds that only 2 percent of Americans put themselves in the "upper class'' and a mere 8 percent consider themselves "lower class.'' The large majority classify themselves as "upper-middle class'' (17 percent) or "middle class'' (45 percent). The rest (27 percent) see themselves as "working class,'' a stepping stone to the middle class.

Because the "middle class'' isn't really the middle -- it's a huge blob -- describing how "it'' feels and thinks is usually an act of simplification, exaggeration or invention. Yet that's routine because politicians and commentators want to show that they grasp the hopes and fears of everyday Americans.

The middle class today is said to be angry and anxious. It's worried about jobs, health insurance and retirement income. The EPI poll explores these discontents. Up to a point, it confirms conventional wisdom. One question asked respondents to agree with one of the following statements:

Most people today face increasing uncertainty about employment, with stagnant incomes, paying more for health care, taxes, and retirement, while those at the top have booming incomes and lower taxes.

Or:

Our economy faces ups and downs, but most people can expect to better themselves, see rising incomes, find good jobs and provide economic security for their families.

By an overwhelming 61 to 34 percent, respondents preferred the first statement. They didn't like oil companies (66 to 13 percent), drug companies (49 to 25 percent) and corporate CEOs (35 to 18 percent).

Globalization wasn't especially popular either; by 59 to 32 percent, respondents favored more limits on imports.

So the middle class is furious, as portrayed. Well, not exactly.

What's striking is the huge gap between people's views about "the economy'' -- an abstraction -- and their own personal situations:

-- Although only 32 percent rate the economy as "excellent'' or ``good,'' 52 percent rate their own personal situation as excellent or good (another 35 percent "fair'' and 13 percent said ``poor'').

-- Most Americans (60 to 37 percent) think their own living standards are rising.

-- Almost 70 percent of Americans say they've attained or will attain the "American Dream,'' as they define it. More than half say success comes from a good education and hard work, not from connections (18 percent) or being born wealthy (13 percent).

Just as Americans often criticize public education but like their local school (or hate Congress while supporting the local congressman), they rationalize personal economic success with national economic shortcomings.

Both "conservative and liberal elites'' are out of touch with typical Americans, say the pollsters who conducted the survey. Conservatives' focus on overall economic performance (say, gross domestic product) minimizes individuals' "hard work'' to improve "their living standards against the odds.'' But liberals underestimate Americans' "emphasis on personal responsibility and overestimate the degree to which (people) see themselves as victims.''

Maybe. But there's a simpler explanation for the confusion: Americans' optimism and perfectionism are constantly mugged by reality. Consider why this will continue.

People value stability and security. They also want higher incomes. Unfortunately, the two sometimes collide. In a recent book, "Economic Turbulence,'' three economists show that the constant turnover of companies and business locations ("establishments'') improves economic growth -- but creates disruption and stress. Replacing less efficient with the more efficient establishments ultimately lowers costs and raises living standards.

Compounding the stress, the price of entry into the middle class always is rising. The more we can have, the more we must have. Keeping up with the Joneses is the curse of our advances and ambitions. Thirty years ago, a middle-class existence didn't include central air conditioning, computers, cell phones or cable television. Similarly, new drugs and surgeries raise the cost of health insurance, reducing coverage and take-home pay. From 1991 to 2005, the cost of fringe benefits (mainly health insurance) rose nearly twice as fast as wages.

Americans cannot escape these realities. The economy will remain precarious if it remains productive. The new technologies and products we celebrate inflict anxiety by redefining middle-class society. Of course, many of today's complaints (growing inequality, eroding health insurance) are legitimate and, to some extent, might be corrected. But any remedies would succeed only temporarily, because they would not erase the basic dilemma.

Sometimes the economy so outperforms expectations (say, after World War II or during the late 1990s) that it creates a lull. But that merely elevates expectations to more unrealistic levels and ensures later disappointment. Inevitably, the middle-class "squeeze'' never vanishes.


Email Friend | Print | RSS | Add to Del.icio.us | Add to Digg
Sponsored Links
 Robert Samuelson
Robert Samuelson
Author Archive