November 10, 2005
Danny Ocean Defends the Rather Network
By Ann Coulter
The most cosseted, self-indulgent, worthless people in the universe are worried
their suffering has been downgraded. For 50 years Hollywood drama queens have
churned out plays, movies, TV shows, books, poems, allegories, museum exhibits,
personal testimonials, dioramas, interpretive dances, wood carvings, cave paintings,
needlepoint wall hangings and scatological limericks about their victimization
at the hands of a brute named Joe McCarthy. Schoolchildren who will learn nothing
about George Washington, Thomas Edison or Paul Revere are forced to read chapter
and verse about the black night of fascism (BNOF) under McCarthy.
But half a century of myth-making later, one little book comes out and gives
the contrary view -- and Hollywood thinks it's Treblinka.
George Clooney, writer and director of the rebuttal, claims he was driven to
make the movie "Good Night, and Good Luck" because "a book came out about how
great McCarthy was."
Q: Ann Coulter's "Treason"?
GC: Yes.
Needless to say I was shocked to learn that George Clooney can read. Liberals
haven't been so shocked by a book since "Uncle Tom's Cabin."
So, apparently, we must revisit the BNOF under McCarthy one more time. (Ethical
dilemma: Would you write a book to set the record straight on Joseph McCarthy
knowing that it might give rise to yet another lame George Clooney movie?)
Clooney said of his small contribution to the "McCarthyism" industry: "I realized
that we had to be incredibly careful with the facts, because if we got any of
them wrong, they could say it's all horse****. So I had to double-source every
scene."
I don't intend to see his movie because -- except for the McCarthy parts --
it sounds like a snoozefest. (Half the reviewers so far have said "good night"
to Clooney, and the other half have said "good luck.") And despite all those
"double-sources," in addition to getting the big facts wrong (about America
and about the Soviet Union), Clooney got all the little facts wrong, too. I
guess he borrowed some of Al Franken's "fact-checkers."
As even liberal reviewers have noted, it was hardly an act of bravery for Edward
R. Murrow to attack McCarthy. The New York Times was attacking
McCarthy, The New York Post was attacking McCarthy and The
Washington Post was attacking McCarthy. Every known news outlet was attacking
McCarthy. McCarthy was in a pitched battle for his life, his career and the
fate of the nation. Murrow merely jumped on the liberal bandwagon -- and rather
late in the game. (You want bravery? Try sitting all the way through "Solaris.")
I gather the movie's two examples of McCarthy's perfidy are the cases of Annie
Lee Moss and Milo Radulovich. As described in detail on Pages 62-64 of "Treason,"
Moss was a proved Communist Party member -- who happened to be working in the
Code Room of the Pentagon. It was an act of sheer madness, like, say, putting
a member of al-Qaida at the Pentagon today or putting Pat Leahy on the Senate
Judiciary Committee. Oh wait ...
Moss put on a big Amos 'n' Andy show for a Senate committee, delighting racist
liberals who happily proclaimed Moss too simpleminded to be a communist. Only
thanks to McCarthy, who ignored the barrage of calumnies from liberals, Moss
was moved to a less sensitive position at the Pentagon.
As for Milo Radulovich, he had absolutely nothing to do with McCarthy. McCarthy
never mentioned his name. So maybe liberals have finally found the one liberal
in the '50s who was not on the payroll of the Soviet Union. I don't know and
I don't care.
Amusingly, Clooney said in an interview that Alger Hiss was "probably" a communist
spy. By now, I believe even the Nation magazine has been forced to admit
Hiss was more than that. But, Clooney says, the point is McCarthy "was wrong
about 99 percent of them."
If McCarthy was "wrong about 99 percent of them," when are we going to get a
movie about one of the 99 percent? I might go see that movie.
Clooney reverts to the standard Hollywood talking point, saying: "(M)ore important
than that, (McCarthy) was wrong every time he denied people their civil liberties."
Ah yes, the old civil liberties canard. Apparently, the only period worse than
the BNOF under McCarthy is the current BNOF under President George Bush. This
was followed by the usual number of specific examples of civil liberties that
had been denied: zero. Liberals churn out hysterical slander daily, but insist
on acting like they are the ones under attack.
The only people being tortured are those of us forced to endure the egos of
Hollywood fantasists who profess left-wing views to prove they are deep thinkers.
Come to think of it, the current BNOF is a lot like the original BNOF under
McCarthy.
Copyright 2005 Ann Coulter
Distributed by Universal Press Syndicate
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Commentary/com-11_10_05_AC.html