The Heartlessness of Amy Coney Barrett's Originalism | RealClearPolitics

The Heartlessness of Amy Coney Barrett's Originalism

The Heartlessness of Amy Coney Barrett's Originalism
(Stefani Reynolds/Pool via AP)

On Day Two of her confirmation hearing for a lifetime appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court, Judge Amy Coney Barrett laid down a few markers about her judicial approach: She would not say that Roe v. Wade, Planned Parenthood v. Casey, Obergefell v. Hodges, and Heller are “super”-precedents, because each is subject to challenges. She did claim that Brown v. Board of Education and Marbury v. Madison are settled law. 

Read Full Article »
Comment
Show comments Hide Comments