Advertisement

Interview with Representative Jerrold Nadler

By Your World w/Neil Cavuto, Your World w/Neil Cavuto - August 22, 2012

Welcome, Account

Special Guests: Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y.

This is a rush transcript from "Your World," August 22, 2012. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.

Watch the latest video at FoxNews.com

NEIL CAVUTO, HOST OF "YOUR WORLD": Welcome, everybody. I'm Neil Cavuto.adsonar_placementId=1502157;adsonar_pid=150758;adsonar_ps=-1;adsonar_zw=198;adsonar_zh=170;adsonar_jv='ads.adsonar.com';

And read them and now creep. The Congressional Budget Office today projecting the federal deficit will hit $1.1 trillion this year. That would make it four years in a row that government red ink has topped $1 trillion, all this as the national debt now quickly closes in on $16 trillion smackers.

So with debt soaring, why are some saying bringing up the issue of the debt commission itself and its recommendations during the presidential debates would cheapen that debate?

One of those Democrats is New York Congressman Jerrold Nadler.

Congressman, good to see you.

REP. JERROLD NADLER, D-N.Y.: Good to be here.

CAVUTO: I'm glad you are here, sir, because I didn't understand why you would have a concern bringing up the debt commission and/or its recommendation?

NADLER: We don't have a concern with that. That’s not the concern.

If you read the letter, or for that matter the press release, the concern is that four senators sent a letter to the debate commission saying set up a debate just on the Simpson-Bowles commission report, the assumption being that the Simpson-Bowles commission is the right thing to do and how courageous are the two candidates in agreeing with how much of it.

What I objected to, what the three of us objected to was that assumption. Maybe the Simpson-Bowles commission is the right thing. Maybe it's not. I don't agree with it, but that's not the point.

We should set -- if you want to set up a robust debate on the debt, how to deal with it, Simpson-Bowles is one suggestion. There are a lot of others on the table. Fine.

(CROSSTALK)

CAVUTO: But the Simpson-Bowles was the commission the president appointed. So just throw it out there as a question.

NADLER: But the commission never agreed on Simpson-Bowles.

CAVUTO: Understood.

NADLER: But that's not the point. Simpson-Bowles is one set of suggestions. If you want to ask what people think about that or why they agree or disagree, by all means, but do not limit it to that, because --

(CROSSTALK)

CAVUTO: But you're not against then bringing it up?

NADLER: No, certainly not.

CAVUTO: So, in the debates, if a panelist wants to say what do you think of the recommendations --

NADLER: Absolutely.

CAVUTO: -- of the commission, you're OK with that?

NADLER: Absolutely.

CAVUTO: You're not -- the rap was that there was a concern not to bring this up.

(CROSSTALK)

NADLER: The rap was very wrong. And we told everyone who said that it was wrong.

My concern is that you shouldn't bias the debate by essentially setting it up and saying we're assuming that the Simpson-Bowles is the right thing. How much do you agree with it, the two candidates? Want to ask, what do you think of the Simpson-Bowles commission, how much do you agree or disagree, fine. You should also ask about other suggestions.

CAVUTO: No doubt. But there's only one commission. There's only one debt commission.

NADLER: But there are a lot of other proposals.

CAVUTO: I understand, but there is only one debt commission.

NADLER: But so what? That commission agreed on nothing.

CAVUTO: We spent close to $100 million on that.

NADLER: And that was wasted.

(CROSSTALK)

CAVUTO: So you think the whole commission was a waste of time?

NADLER: Absolutely. That commission was wasted.

CAVUTO: Why, just because they came with ideas you don't like?

NADLER: No, they didn't come with ideas. They didn't agree on any ideas.  Print  Email  Share    Recommend Tweet

continued...

< 1 2 3> adsonar_placementId=1493988; adsonar_pid=1373767; adsonar_ps=-1; adsonar_zw=612; adsonar_zh=240; adsonar_jv='ads.adsonar.com'; Common Sense and Transcript Calendar

Choose a category

Common Sense InterviewsInterviews2Common Sense

Latest Transcript

August 22, 2012

Please click on a date for previous transcripts:

Loading Datepicker ADVERTISEMENT Follow TeamCavuto

Follow us on Twitter to get exclusive updates and announcements from the show!

Thursday on 'Your World'

Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson joins us LIVE with Neil at 4pm to discuss election 2012 and more!

Your World w/ Cavuto Poll Take Our Poll(survey software) Friend 'Your World' on Facebook What Do You Think?

Send Neil your comments & tune into FOX Business tonight at 8pm ET. Neil may read yours on air!

Don't get FBN? DEMAND IT!Find out if you get FBN here

Follow us on Twitter @TeamCavuto

ADVERTISEMENT Additional Resources

Fox Business

Get the latest news on business, investments, the stock market, and more! Plus, try out useful tools and calculators for your financial questions and needs.

Cavuto on Business

The most powerful name in news brings you The Cost of Freedom, the most powerful business block on cable news!

Buy Neil Cavuto's Books

Get inspired with the New York Times bestselling books Your Money or Your Life and More Than Money by Neil Cavuto.

Shows America Live Fox & Friends Weekend Happening Now Studio B America News HQ Fox News Watch Huckabee The Cost of Freedom America's Newsroom Fox Report Justice with Judge Jeanine The Five Cavuto Geraldo at Large Red Eye w/ Gutfeld The Journal Editorial Report Fox News Sunday Greta Special Report The O' Reilly Factor Fox & Friends First Hannity Specials War Stories Fox & Friends Networks Fox News Fox Business Search

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2012 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes. Privacy - Terms

Connect with Your World with Neil Cavuto

Follow TeamCavuto

try { window.foxshows.footerbar.init("socialbar-shows-gnr","TeamCavuto "); } catch(err) { } try { var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-3128154-2"); pageTracker._setDomainName(".foxnews.com"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {} $.ad.pre(); setPageVideo(); // video //= 0) {query += 'url' + i + '=' + encodeURIComponent(links[i].href) + '&';}}document.write('');})();//]]> var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-3128154-2']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageLoadTime']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })();

NEIL CAVUTO, HOST OF "YOUR WORLD": Welcome, everybody. I'm Neil Cavuto.

And read them and now creep. The Congressional Budget Office today projecting the federal deficit will hit $1.1 trillion this year. That would make it four years in a row that government red ink has topped $1 trillion, all this as the national debt now quickly closes in on $16 trillion smackers.

So with debt soaring, why are some saying bringing up the issue of the debt commission itself and its recommendations during the presidential debates would cheapen that debate?

One of those Democrats is New York Congressman Jerrold Nadler.

Congressman, good to see you.

REP. JERROLD NADLER, D-N.Y.: Good to be here.

CAVUTO: I'm glad you are here, sir, because I didn't understand why you would have a concern bringing up the debt commission and/or its recommendation?

NADLER: We don't have a concern with that. That’s not the concern.

If you read the letter, or for that matter the press release, the concern is that four senators sent a letter to the debate commission saying set up a debate just on the Simpson-Bowles commission report, the assumption being that the Simpson-Bowles commission is the right thing to do and how courageous are the two candidates in agreeing with how much of it.

What I objected to, what the three of us objected to was that assumption. Maybe the Simpson-Bowles commission is the right thing. Maybe it's not. I don't agree with it, but that's not the point.

We should set -- if you want to set up a robust debate on the debt, how to deal with it, Simpson-Bowles is one suggestion. There are a lot of others on the table. Fine.

(CROSSTALK)

CAVUTO: But the Simpson-Bowles was the commission the president appointed. So just throw it out there as a question.

NADLER: But the commission never agreed on Simpson-Bowles.

CAVUTO: Understood.

NADLER: But that's not the point. Simpson-Bowles is one set of suggestions. If you want to ask what people think about that or why they agree or disagree, by all means, but do not limit it to that, because --

(CROSSTALK)

CAVUTO: But you're not against then bringing it up?

NADLER: No, certainly not.

CAVUTO: So, in the debates, if a panelist wants to say what do you think of the recommendations --

NADLER: Absolutely.

CAVUTO: -- of the commission, you're OK with that?

NADLER: Absolutely.

CAVUTO: You're not -- the rap was that there was a concern not to bring this up.

(CROSSTALK)

NADLER: The rap was very wrong. And we told everyone who said that it was wrong.

My concern is that you shouldn't bias the debate by essentially setting it up and saying we're assuming that the Simpson-Bowles is the right thing. How much do you agree with it, the two candidates? Want to ask, what do you think of the Simpson-Bowles commission, how much do you agree or disagree, fine. You should also ask about other suggestions.

CAVUTO: No doubt. But there's only one commission. There's only one debt commission.

NADLER: But there are a lot of other proposals.

CAVUTO: I understand, but there is only one debt commission.

NADLER: But so what? That commission agreed on nothing.

CAVUTO: We spent close to $100 million on that.

NADLER: And that was wasted.

(CROSSTALK)

CAVUTO: So you think the whole commission was a waste of time?

NADLER: Absolutely. That commission was wasted.

CAVUTO: Why, just because they came with ideas you don't like?

NADLER: No, they didn't come with ideas. They didn't agree on any ideas.  Print  Email  Share    Recommend Tweet

continued...

< 1 2 3> adsonar_placementId=1493988; adsonar_pid=1373767; adsonar_ps=-1; adsonar_zw=612; adsonar_zh=240; adsonar_jv='ads.adsonar.com'; Common Sense and Transcript Calendar

Choose a category

Common Sense InterviewsInterviews2Common Sense

Latest Transcript

August 22, 2012

Please click on a date for previous transcripts:

Loading Datepicker ADVERTISEMENT Follow TeamCavuto

Follow us on Twitter to get exclusive updates and announcements from the show!

Thursday on 'Your World'

Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson joins us LIVE with Neil at 4pm to discuss election 2012 and more!

Your World w/ Cavuto Poll Take Our Poll(survey software) Friend 'Your World' on Facebook What Do You Think?

Send Neil your comments & tune into FOX Business tonight at 8pm ET. Neil may read yours on air!

Don't get FBN? DEMAND IT!Find out if you get FBN here

Follow us on Twitter @TeamCavuto

ADVERTISEMENT Additional Resources

Fox Business

Get the latest news on business, investments, the stock market, and more! Plus, try out useful tools and calculators for your financial questions and needs.

Cavuto on Business

The most powerful name in news brings you The Cost of Freedom, the most powerful business block on cable news!

Buy Neil Cavuto's Books

Get inspired with the New York Times bestselling books Your Money or Your Life and More Than Money by Neil Cavuto.

Shows America Live Fox & Friends Weekend Happening Now Studio B America News HQ Fox News Watch Huckabee The Cost of Freedom America's Newsroom Fox Report Justice with Judge Jeanine The Five Cavuto Geraldo at Large Red Eye w/ Gutfeld The Journal Editorial Report Fox News Sunday Greta Special Report The O' Reilly Factor Fox & Friends First Hannity Specials War Stories Fox & Friends Networks Fox News Fox Business Search

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2012 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes. Privacy - Terms

Connect with Your World with Neil Cavuto

Follow TeamCavuto

try { window.foxshows.footerbar.init("socialbar-shows-gnr","TeamCavuto "); } catch(err) { } try { var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-3128154-2"); pageTracker._setDomainName(".foxnews.com"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {} $.ad.pre(); setPageVideo(); // video //= 0) {query += 'url' + i + '=' + encodeURIComponent(links[i].href) + '&';}}document.write('');})();//]]> var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-3128154-2']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageLoadTime']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })();

And read them and now creep. The Congressional Budget Office today projecting the federal deficit will hit $1.1 trillion this year. That would make it four years in a row that government red ink has topped $1 trillion, all this as the national debt now quickly closes in on $16 trillion smackers.

So with debt soaring, why are some saying bringing up the issue of the debt commission itself and its recommendations during the presidential debates would cheapen that debate?

One of those Democrats is New York Congressman Jerrold Nadler.

Congressman, good to see you.

REP. JERROLD NADLER, D-N.Y.: Good to be here.

CAVUTO: I'm glad you are here, sir, because I didn't understand why you would have a concern bringing up the debt commission and/or its recommendation?

NADLER: We don't have a concern with that. That’s not the concern.

If you read the letter, or for that matter the press release, the concern is that four senators sent a letter to the debate commission saying set up a debate just on the Simpson-Bowles commission report, the assumption being that the Simpson-Bowles commission is the right thing to do and how courageous are the two candidates in agreeing with how much of it.

What I objected to, what the three of us objected to was that assumption. Maybe the Simpson-Bowles commission is the right thing. Maybe it's not. I don't agree with it, but that's not the point.

We should set -- if you want to set up a robust debate on the debt, how to deal with it, Simpson-Bowles is one suggestion. There are a lot of others on the table. Fine.

(CROSSTALK)

CAVUTO: But the Simpson-Bowles was the commission the president appointed. So just throw it out there as a question.

NADLER: But the commission never agreed on Simpson-Bowles.

CAVUTO: Understood.

NADLER: But that's not the point. Simpson-Bowles is one set of suggestions. If you want to ask what people think about that or why they agree or disagree, by all means, but do not limit it to that, because --

(CROSSTALK)

CAVUTO: But you're not against then bringing it up?

NADLER: No, certainly not.

CAVUTO: So, in the debates, if a panelist wants to say what do you think of the recommendations --

NADLER: Absolutely.

CAVUTO: -- of the commission, you're OK with that?

NADLER: Absolutely.

CAVUTO: You're not -- the rap was that there was a concern not to bring this up.

(CROSSTALK)

NADLER: The rap was very wrong. And we told everyone who said that it was wrong.

Read Full Article »

Latest On Twitter

Follow Real Clear Politics

Real Clear Politics Video

More RCP Video Highlights »