Jim Webb impressed yesterday in his debate with George Allen on Meet the Press. Here are write ups on the debate from the Washington Post, the New York Times, the Virginian Pilot, and the Richmond Times-Dispatch.

The most noticeable difference to me was that Webb came off as more direct than Allen. As the current president has proven, being direct is a valuable political asset even when voters disagree with your positions. Russert hit Allen with a number of questions which defied simplistic answers, so Allen had to set off explaining. He did a decent enough job of defending his positions, but remember the oldest axiom in politics: if you find yourself explaining, you're losing.

In spots Allen showed a lack of responsiveness, right down to the final question about his willingness to serve a full term in the Senate. Even though it was the typical kabuki dance we've come to expect from a politician with aspirations of higher office, it contributed to the overall perception of the debate.

Though Webb acquitted himself well on Sunday, don't expect this one debate to change the dynamic of the race. Allen took a hit in the polls for his "macaca" comments but still holds a 4.7% lead over Webb in the current RCP Average. Virginia is still a healthy red state, and George Allen is a well known, well liked incumbent with tons of cash who also happens to be a fantastic retail politician.