The San Francisco Chronicle runs an "interactive" feature called "Two Cents" where readers are encouraged to respond to questions posed by the editorial staff. Here's the "Two Cents" question the Chronicle asked this week: Who's more dangerous: bin Laden or Bush?. Don't snicker, I believe they were being serious.

Now check out some of the responses, which I'm sure surprised the Chronicle's staff:

"While I am no defender of Bush, this question borders on the offensive."

"I would never compare Bush to bin Laden. "

"My jaw dropped in disbelief at this question."

Coming next week: Who is more of a tyrant: Saddam Hussein or George W. Bush?