<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> 
<rss version="2.0"> 
 <channel> 
<title><![CDATA[RealClearPolitics - Articles by Daniel Mitchell]]></title><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/authors/?id=16154</link><description><![CDATA[Daniel Mitchell]]></description><category domain="16154">Author</category><item>
					<title><![CDATA[VATs Mean Big Government]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/06/05/vats_mean_big_government_96845.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/06/05/vats_mean_big_government_96845.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>There is growing interest in Washington in a new national consumption tax, otherwise known as a value-added tax or VAT. Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D., N.D.), for example, recently told the Washington Post that "a VAT" has "got to be on the table" as part of "fundamental tax reform."</p>
<p>President Barack Obama is already looking at a wide range of other potential tax increases, including higher income tax rates, restrictions on itemized deductions, an energy tax, and higher payroll tax rates. Even if they all became law, the revenues would not come close to satisfying his and Congress's appetite for bigger government, particularly a government-run health-care...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Why the Bailout is Bad for America]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/10/financial_bailout_would_impose.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/10/financial_bailout_would_impose.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Proponents of a bailout also are trying to rattle credit markets by arguing that inaction will cripple commercial and household lending. Fortunately, there is little evidence of a freeze in credit markets, thought the Administration's rash rhetoric and the specter of a bailout doubtlessly are causing needless uncertainty and temporarily higher interest rates. Once the issue is resolved, one way or the other, credit markets will resume normal operations. The only question is whether capital allocation will be distorted - and long-run growth hindered - by government intervention.</p><p>Providing government with enormous - and opaque - new powers is likely to exacerbate economic uncertainty...]]></description>
				</item>
   </channel>
</rss>