<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> 
<rss version="2.0"> 
 <channel> 
<title><![CDATA[RealClearPolitics - Articles by Charles Krauthammer]]></title><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/authors/?id=14565</link><description><![CDATA[Charles Krauthammer]]></description><category domain="14565">Author</category><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Travesty in New York]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/11/20/travesty_in_new_york_99224.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/11/20/travesty_in_new_york_99224.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- For late-19th-century anarchists, terrorism was the  "propaganda of the deed." And the most successful propaganda-by-deed in history was 9/11 -- not just the most destructive, but the most spectacular and telegenic.</p>
<p>And now its self-proclaimed architect, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, has been given by the Obama administration a civilian trial in New York. Just as the memory fades, 9/11 has been granted a second life -- and KSM, a second act: "9/11, The Director's Cut," narration by KSM.</p>
<p>September 11, 2001 had to speak for itself. A decade later, the deed will be  given voice. KSM has gratuitously been presented with the greatest propaganda platform imaginable -- a...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Explaining Away Mass Murder]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/11/13/medicalizing_mass_murder_99142.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/11/13/medicalizing_mass_murder_99142.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- What a surprise -- that someone who shouts "Allahu Akbar" (the "God is great" jihadist battle cry) as he is shooting up a room of American soldiers might have Islamist motives. It certainly was a surprise to the mainstream media, which spent the weekend after the Fort Hood massacre downplaying Nidal Hasan's religious beliefs.</p>
<p>"I cringe that he's a Muslim. ... I think he's probably just a nut case," said Newsweek's Evan Thomas. Some were more adamant. Time's Joe Klein decried "odious attempts by Jewish extremists ... to argue that the massacre perpetrated by Nidal Hasan was somehow a direct consequence of his Islamic beliefs." While none could match Klein's peculiar...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[The Myth of '08, Demolished]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/11/06/the_myth_of_08_demolished_99048.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/11/06/the_myth_of_08_demolished_99048.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- Sure, Election Day 2009 will scare moderate Democrats and make passage of Obamacare more difficult. Sure, it makes it easier for resurgent Republicans to raise money and recruit candidates for 2010. But the most important effect of Tuesday's elections is historical. It demolishes the great realignment myth of 2008.</p>
<p>In the aftermath of last year's Obama sweep, we heard endlessly about its fundamental, revolutionary, transformational nature. How it was ushering in an FDR-like realignment for the 21st century in which new demographics -- most prominently, rising minorities and the young -- would bury the GOP far into the future. One book proclaimed "The Death of...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Obama's Bush Blame Game]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/10/30/its_time_for_obama_to_stop_blaming_bush.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/10/30/its_time_for_obama_to_stop_blaming_bush.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- Old Soviet joke:</p>
<p>Moscow, 1953. Stalin calls in Khrushchev.</p>
<p>"Niki, I'm dying. Don't have much to leave you. Just three envelopes. Open them, one at a time, when you get into big trouble."</p>
<p>A few years later, first crisis. Khrushchev opens envelope 1: "Blame everything on me. Uncle Joe."</p>
<p>A few years later, a really big crisis. Opens envelope 2: "Blame everything on me. Again. Good luck, Uncle Joe."</p>
<p>Third crisis. Opens envelope 3: "Prepare three envelopes."</p>
<p>In the Barack Obama version, there are 50 or so such blame-Bush free passes before the gig is up. By my calculation, Obama has already burned through a good 49. Is there anything he...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[White House Tactics Go Too Far]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/10/23/white_house_tactics_go_too_far.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/10/23/white_house_tactics_go_too_far.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- Rahm Emanuel once sent a dead fish to a live pollster. Now he's put a horse's head in Roger Ailes' bed.</p>
<p>Not very subtle. And not very smart. Ailes doesn't scare easily.</p>
<p>The White House has declared war on Fox News. White House communications director Anita Dunn said that Fox is "opinion journalism masquerading as news." Patting rival networks on the head for their authenticity (read: docility), senior adviser David Axelrod declared Fox "not really a news station." And Chief of Staff Emanuel told (warned?) the other networks not to "be led (by) and following Fox."</p>
<p>Meaning? If Fox runs a story critical of the administration -- from exposing White House...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Debacle in Moscow]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/10/16/debacle_in_moscow_98741.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/10/16/debacle_in_moscow_98741.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- About the only thing more comical than Barack Obama's Nobel Peace Prize was the reaction of those who deemed the award "premature," as if the brilliance of Obama's foreign policy is so self-evident and its success so assured that if only the Norway Five had waited a few years, his Nobel worthiness would have been universally acknowledged.</p>
<p>To believe this, you have to be a dreamy adolescent (preferably Scandinavian and a member of the Socialist International) or an indiscriminate imbiber of White House talking points. After all, this was precisely the spin on the president's various apology tours through Europe and the Middle East: National self-denigration -- excuse...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Young Hamlet's Agony]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/10/09/young_hamlets_agony_98640.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/10/09/young_hamlets_agony_98640.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- The genius of democracy is the rotation of power, which forces the opposition to be serious -- particularly about things like war, about which until Jan. 20 of this year Democrats were decidedly unserious.</p>
<p>When the Iraq War (which a majority of Senate Democrats voted for) ran into trouble and casualties began to mount, Democrats followed the shifting winds of public opinion and turned decidedly anti-war. But needing political cover because of their post-Vietnam reputation for weakness on national defense, they adopted Afghanistan as their pet war.</p>
<p>"I was part of the 2004 Kerry campaign, which elevated the idea of Afghanistan as 'the right war' to conventional...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Obama's French Lesson]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/10/02/obamas_french_lesson_98547.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/10/02/obamas_french_lesson_98547.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>"President Obama, I support the Americans' outstretched hand. But what did the international community gain from these offers of dialogue? Nothing." -- French President Nicolas Sarkozy, Sept. 24</p>
<p>WASHINGTON -- When France chides you for appeasement, you know you're scraping bottom. Just how low we've sunk was demonstrated by the Obama administration's satisfaction when Russia's president said of Iran, after meeting President Obama at the U.N., that "sanctions are seldom productive, but they are sometimes inevitable."</p>
<p>You see? The Obama magic. Engagement works. Russia is on board. Except that, as The Washington Post inconveniently pointed out, President Dmitry Medvedev said...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[A Great Good Man]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/09/25/a_great_good_man_98456.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/09/25/a_great_good_man_98456.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- After the plain pine box is lowered into the grave, the mourners are asked to come forward -- immediate family first -- and shovel dirt onto the casket. Only when it is fully covered, only when all that can be seen is dust, is the ceremony complete.</p>
<p>Such is the Jewish way of burial. Its simplicity, austerity and unsentimentality would have appealed to Irving Kristol, who was buried by friends and family Tuesday. Equally fitting for this most unsentimental of men was the spare funeral service that preceded the burial. It consisted of the recitation of two psalms and the prayer for the dead, and two short addresses: an appreciation by the rabbi, followed by a touching,...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Does He Lie?]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/09/18/does_he_lie_98363.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/09/18/does_he_lie_98363.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- You lie? No. Barack Obama doesn't lie. He's too subtle for that. He ... well, you judge.</p>
<p>Herewith three examples within a single speech -- the now-famous Obama-Wilson "you lie" address to Congress on health care -- of Obama's relationship with truth.</p>
<p>(1) "I will not sign (a plan)," he solemnly pledged, "if it adds one dime to the deficit, now or in the future. Period."</p>
<p>Wonderful. The president seems serious, veto-ready, determined to hold the line. Until, notes Harvard economist Greg Mankiw, you get to Obama's very next sentence: "And to prove that I'm serious, there will be a provision in this plan that requires us to come forward with more spending...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Van Jones and the 'Truthers']]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/09/11/the_van_jones_matter_98261.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/09/11/the_van_jones_matter_98261.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- So Van Jones, the defenestrated White House green-jobs czar, once called Republicans "a--holes." Big deal. I've said worse about Democrats. I've said worse about Republicans. I've said worse about members of my family (you know who you are).</p>
<p>How prissy have we become? Are we allowed no salt in our linguistic diets?</p>
<p>Having once written a column praising Vice President Cheney's pithy deployment of the F-word -- on the floor of the Senate, no less -- I rise in defense of Jones. True, Jones' particular choice of epithet had none of the one-syllable concision, the onomatopoeic suggestiveness, the explosive charm of Cheney's. But you don't fire a guy for...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Obama, The Mortal]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/09/04/obama_the_mortal_98160.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/09/04/obama_the_mortal_98160.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- What happened to President Obama? His wax wings having melted, he is the man who fell to earth. What happened to bring his popularity down further than that of any new president in polling history save Gerald Ford (post-Nixon pardon)?</p>
<p>The conventional wisdom is that Obama made a tactical mistake by farming out his agenda to Congress and allowing himself to be pulled left by the doctrinaire liberals of the Democratic congressional leadership. But the idea of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi pulling Obama left is quite ridiculous. Where do you think he came from, this friend of Chavista ex-terrorist William Ayers, of PLO apologist Rashid Khalidi, of racialist inciter...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Can Dems Rescue ObamaCare?]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/08/28/obamacare_the_exit_strategy_98071.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/08/28/obamacare_the_exit_strategy_98071.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- Obamacare Version 1.0 is dead. The 1,000-page monstrosity that emerged in various editions from Congress was done in by widespread national revulsion not just at its expense and intrusiveness but at the mendacity with which it is being sold. You don't need a Ph.D. to see that the promise to expand coverage and reduce costs is a crude deception, or that cutting $500 billion from Medicare without affecting care is a fiction.</p>
<p>But there is an exit strategy. And a politically clever one, if the Democrats are smart enough to seize it.</p>
<p>(1) Forget the public option. Whatever the merits, and they are few, it is political poison. It dies by the Liasson Logic, the...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[The Truth About Death Counseling]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/08/21/lets_be_honest_about_death_counseling_97982.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/08/21/lets_be_honest_about_death_counseling_97982.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- Let's see if we can have a reasoned discussion about end-of-life counseling.</p>
<p>We might start by asking Sarah Palin to leave the room. I've got nothing against her. She's a remarkable political talent. But there are no "death panels" in the Democratic health care bills, and to say that there are is to debase the debate.</p>
<p>We also have to tell the defenders of the notorious Section 1233 of H.R. 3200 that it is not quite as benign as they pretend. To offer government reimbursement to any doctor who gives end-of-life counseling -- whether or not the patient asked for it -- is to create an incentive for such a chat.</p>
<p>What do you think such a chat would be like?...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[More Health Care Nonsense]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/08/14/the_preventive_care_myth_97889.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/08/14/the_preventive_care_myth_97889.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- In the 48 hours of June 15-16, President Obama lost the health care debate. First, a letter from the Congressional Budget Office to Sen. Edward Kennedy reported that his health committee's reform bill would add $1 trillion in debt over the next decade. Then the CBO reported that the other Senate bill, being written by the Finance Committee, would add $1.6 trillion. The central contradiction of Obamacare was fatally exposed: From his first address to Congress, Obama insisted on the dire need for restructuring the health care system because out-of-control costs were bankrupting the Treasury and wrecking the U.S. economy -- yet the Democrats' plans would make the problem...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Health Care Reform: A Better Plan]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/08/07/health_care_reform_a_better_plan_97804.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/08/07/health_care_reform_a_better_plan_97804.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- In 1986, Ronald Reagan and Bill Bradley created a legislative miracle. They fashioned a tax reform that stripped loopholes, political favors, payoffs, patronage and other corruptions out of the tax system. With the resulting savings, they lowered tax rates across the board. Those reductions, combined with the elimination of the enormous inefficiencies and perverse incentives that go into tax sheltering, helped propel a 20-year economic boom.</p>
<p>In overhauling any segment of our economy, the 1986 tax reform should be the model. Yet today's ruling Democrats propose to fix our extremely high quality (but inefficient and therefore expensive) health care system with 1,000...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Obamacare in Retreat]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/07/31/obamacare_the_coming_retreat.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/07/31/obamacare_the_coming_retreat.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- Yesterday, Barack Obama was God. Today, he's fallen from grace, the magic gone, his health care reform dead. If you believed the first idiocy -- and half the mainstream media did -- you'll believe the second. Don't believe either.</p>
<p>Conventional wisdom always makes straight-line projections. They are always wrong. Yes, Obama's aura has diminished, in part because of overweening overexposure. But by year's end he will emerge with something he can call health care reform. The Democrats in Congress will pass it because they must. Otherwise, they'll have slain their own savior in his first year in office.</p>
<p>But that bill will look nothing like the massive reform Obama...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Rhetoric Meets Reality]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/07/24/why_obamacare_is_sinking_97598.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/07/24/why_obamacare_is_sinking_97598.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- What happened to Obamacare? Rhetoric met reality. As both candidate and president, the master rhetorician could conjure a world in which he bestows upon you health care nirvana: more coverage, less cost.</p>
<p>But you can't fake it in legislation. Once you commit your fantasies to words and numbers, the Congressional Budget Office comes along and declares that the emperor has no clothes.</p>
<p>President Obama premised the need for reform on the claim that medical costs are destroying the economy. True. But now we learn -- surprise! -- that universal coverage <em>increases</em> costs. The congressional Democrats' health care plans, says the CBO, increase costs in the range...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[The Moon We Left Behind]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/07/17/the_moon_we_forgot_97498.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/07/17/the_moon_we_forgot_97498.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- Michael Crichton once wrote that if you had told a physicist in 1899 that within a hundred years humankind would, among other wonders (nukes, commercial airlines), "travel to the moon, and then lose interest ... the physicist would almost certainly pronounce you mad." In 2000, I quoted these lines expressing Crichton's incredulity at America's abandonment of the moon. It is now 2009 and the moon recedes ever further.</p>
<p>Next week marks the 40th anniversary of the first moon landing. We say we will return in 2020. But that promise was made by a previous president, and this president has defined himself as the anti-matter to George Bush. Moreover, for all Obama's...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Our Foreign Policy Neophyte]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/07/10/plumage_-_but_at_a_price_97381.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/07/10/plumage_-_but_at_a_price_97381.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- The signing ceremony in Moscow was a grand affair. For Barack Obama, foreign policy neophyte and "reset" man, the arms reduction agreement had a Kissingerian air. A fine feather in his cap. And our president likes his plumage.</p>
<p>Unfortunately for the United States, the country Obama represents, the prospective treaty is useless at best, detrimental at worst.</p>
<p>Useless because the level of offensive nuclear weaponry, the subject of the U.S.-Russia "Joint Understanding," is an irrelevance. We could today terminate all such negotiations, invite the Russians to build as many warheads as they want, and profitably watch them spend themselves into penury, as did their...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[The Meaning of Ricci]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/07/03/the_meaning_of_ricci_97283.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/07/03/the_meaning_of_ricci_97283.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court's ruling on the Ricci case -- that white firemen suffered illegal discrimination when a promotional test on which they did well was thrown out because not enough blacks did well -- will have no effect on Sonia Sotomayor's nomination to the Supreme Court. While overturned on Ricci, she is protected by the four dissenting justices who upheld the side of the case she had taken as a Circuit Court judge. Sotomayor was additionally helped by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's insistence on reading her dissent from the bench, as if to emphasize the legitimacy of her position -- and, by implication, Sotomayor's.</p>
<p>Ricci left Sotomayor relatively unscathed. But not...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[What Will Mousavi Do Next?]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/06/26/what_will_mousavi_do_next.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/06/26/what_will_mousavi_do_next.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- Iran today is a revolution in search of its Yeltsin. Without leadership, demonstrators will take to the street only so many times to face tear gas, batons and bullets. They need a leader like Boris Yeltsin: a former establishment figure with newly revolutionary credentials and legitimacy, who stands on a tank and gives the opposition direction by calling for the unthinkable -- the abolition of the old political order.</p>
<p>Right now the Iranian revolution has no leader. As this is written, opposition candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi has not appeared in public since June 18. And the Khamenei-Ahmadinejad regime has shown the requisite efficiency and ruthlessness at suppressing...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Obama Clueless on Iran]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/06/19/obama_clueless_on_iran.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/06/19/obama_clueless_on_iran.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- Millions of Iranians take to the streets to defy a theocratic dictatorship that, among its other finer qualities, is a self-declared enemy of America and the tolerance and liberties it represents. The demonstrators are fighting on their own, but they await just a word that America is on their side.</p>
<p>And what do they hear from the president of the United States? Silence. Then, worse. Three days in, the president makes clear his policy: continued "dialogue" with their clerical masters.</p>
<p>Dialogue with a regime that is breaking heads, shooting demonstrators, expelling journalists, arresting activists. Engagement with -- which inevitably confers legitimacy upon --...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Hovering on High: Obama Surveys the World]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/06/12/hovering_on_high_obama_surveys_the_world_96964.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/06/12/hovering_on_high_obama_surveys_the_world_96964.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- When President Obama returned from his first European trip, I observed that while over there he had been "acting the philosopher-king who hovers above the fray mediating" between America and the world. Now that Obama has returned from his "Muslim world" pilgrimage, even the left agrees. "Obama's standing above the country, above -- above the world. He's sort of God," Newsweek's Evan Thomas said to a concurring Chris Matthews, reflecting on Obama's lofty perception of himself as the great transcender.</p>
<p>Not that Obama considers himself divine. (He sees himself as merely messianic, or, at worst, apostolic.) But he does position himself as hovering above mere mortals,...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Obama the Humble]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/06/05/the_settlement_canard_96840.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/06/05/the_settlement_canard_96840.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- Obama the Humble declares there will be no more "dictating" to other countries. We should "forge partnerships as opposed to simply dictating solutions," he told the G-20 summit. In Middle East negotiations, he told al-Arabiya, America will henceforth "start by listening, because all too often the United States starts by dictating."</p>
<p>An admirable sentiment. It applies to everyone -- Iran, Russia, Cuba, Syria, even Venezuela. Except Israel. Israel is ordered to freeze all settlement activity. As Secretary of State Clinton imperiously explained the diktat: "a stop to settlements -- not some settlements, not outposts, not natural-growth exceptions."</p>
<p>What's the...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Sotomayor: Rebut, Then Confirm]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/05/29/sotomayor_criticize_then_confirm_96713.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/05/29/sotomayor_criticize_then_confirm_96713.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- Sonia Sotomayor has a classic American story. So does Frank Ricci.</p>
<p>Ricci is a New Haven firefighter stationed seven blocks from where Sotomayor went to law school (Yale). Raised in blue-collar Wallingford, Conn., Ricci struggled as a C and D student in public schools ill-prepared to address his serious learning disabilities. Nonetheless he persevered, becoming a junior firefighter and Connecticut's youngest certified EMT.</p>
<p>After studying fire science at a community college, he became a New Haven  "truckie," the guy who puts up ladders and breaks holes in burning buildings. When his department announced exams for promotions, he spent $1,000 on books, quit his...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Pick Puts Focus on Identity Politics]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/05/26/krauthammer_reacts_to_sotomayor_pick.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/05/26/krauthammer_reacts_to_sotomayor_pick.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Obama's Deeds Vindicate Bush]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/05/22/obama_vindicates_bush.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/05/22/obama_vindicates_bush.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p><em>"We were able to hold it off with George Bush. The idea that we might find ourselves fighting with the Obama administration over these powers is really stunning." -- Unnamed and dismayed human rights advocate, on legalizing indefinite detention of alleged terrorists, New York Times, May 21</em></p>
<p>WASHINGTON -- If hypocrisy is the homage that vice pays to virtue, then the flip-flops on previously denounced anti-terror measures are the homage that Barack Obama pays to George Bush. Within 125 days, Obama has adopted with only minor modifications huge swaths of the entire, allegedly lawless Bush program.</p>
<p>The latest flip-flop is the restoration of military tribunals. During...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Why Pelosi's Hypocrisy Matters]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/05/15/the_torture_debate_continued_96496.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/05/15/the_torture_debate_continued_96496.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- Earlier this month, I wrote a <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/05/01/torture_no_except_96283.html">column</a> outlining two exceptions to the no-torture rule: the ticking time bomb scenario and its less extreme variant in which a high-value terrorist refuses to divulge crucial information that could save innocent lives. The column elicited protest and opposition that were, shall we say, spirited.</p>
<p>And occasionally stupid. Dan Froomkin, writing for washingtonpost.com and echoing a common meme among my critics, <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/white-house-watch/torture/krauthammers-asterisks.html">asserted</a> that "the ticking time bomb...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[The Hamas 'Peace' Gambit]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/05/08/the_hamas_peace_gambit_96398.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/05/08/the_hamas_peace_gambit_96398.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>"Apart from the time restriction (a truce that lapses after 10 years) and the refusal to accept Israel's existence, Mr. Meshal's terms approximate the Arab League peace plan ... "<br /> -- Hamas peace plan, as explained by The New York Times</p>
<p>"Apart from that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you enjoy the play?"<br /> -- Tom Lehrer, satirist</p>
<p>WASHINGTON -- The Times conducted a five-hour interview with Hamas leader Khaled Meshal at his Damascus headquarters. <em>Mirabile dictu</em>, they're offering a peace plan with a two-state solution. Except. The offer is not a peace but a truce that expires after 10 years. Meaning that after Israel has fatally weakened itself by settling millions...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Pelosi: Utterly Contemptible]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/05/01/torture_no_except_96283.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/05/01/torture_no_except_96283.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- Torture is an impermissible evil. Except under two circumstances. The first is the ticking time bomb. An innocent's life is at stake. The bad guy you have captured possesses information that could save this life. He refuses to divulge. In such a case, the choice is easy. Even John McCain, the most admirable and estimable torture opponent, says openly that in such circumstances, "You do what you have to do." And then take the responsibility.</p>
<p>Some people, however, believe you never torture. Ever. They are akin to conscientious objectors who will never fight in any war under any circumstances, and for whom we correctly show respect by exempting from war duty. But we...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Obama: The Grand Strategy]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/04/24/obama_the_grand_strategy_96152.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/04/24/obama_the_grand_strategy_96152.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- Unified theory of Obamaism, final installment:</p>
<p>In the service of his ultimate mission -- the leveling of social inequalities -- President Obama offers a tripartite social democratic agenda: nationalized health care, federalized education (ultimately guaranteed through college) and a cash-cow carbon tax (or its equivalent) to subsidize the other two.</p>
<p>Problem is, the math doesn't add up. Not even a carbon tax would pay for Obama's vastly expanded welfare state. Nor will Midwest Democrats stand for a tax that would devastate their already crumbling region.</p>
<p>What is obviously required is entitlement reform, meaning Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid....]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Obama's Faulty 'Foundation']]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/04/17/the_sting_in_four_parts_96028.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/04/17/the_sting_in_four_parts_96028.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- Franklin Roosevelt gave us the New Deal. John Kennedy gave us the New Frontier. In a major domestic policy address at Georgetown University this week, Barack Obama promised -- eight times -- a "New Foundation." For those too thick to have noticed this proclamation of a new era in American history, the White House Web site helpfully titled its speech excerpts "A New Foundation."</p>
<p>As it happens, Obama is not the first to try this slogan. President Carter peppered his 1979 State of the Union address with five "New Foundations" (and eight more just naked "foundations"). Like most of Carter's endeavors, this one failed, perhaps because (as I recall it being said at the...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[It's Your Country Too, Mr. President]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/04/its_your_country_too_mr_presid.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/04/its_your_country_too_mr_presid.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>     The obligatory emergency Security Council session produced nothing. No sanctions. No resolution. Not even a statement. China and Russia professed to find no violation whatsoever. They would not even permit a U.N. statement that dared express "concern," let alone condemnation. </p><p>     Having thus bravely rallied the international community and summoned the U.N. -- a fiction and a farce, respectively -- what was Obama's further response? The very next day, his defense secretary announced drastic cuts in missile defense, including halting further deployment of Alaska-based interceptors designed precisely to shoot down North Korean ICBMs. Such is the "realism" Obama promised to...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Obama's Ultimate Agenda]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/04/obamas_ultimate_agenda.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/04/obamas_ultimate_agenda.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>     Despite these astonishments, I remain more amused than alarmed. First, the notion of presidential car warranties strikes me as simply too bizarre, too comical, to mark the beginning of Yankee Peronism.</p><p>     Second, there is every political incentive to make these interventions in the banks and autos temporary and circumscribed. For President Obama, autos and banks are sideshows. Enormous sideshows, to be sure, but had the financial meltdown and the looming auto bankruptcies not been handed to him, he would hardly have gone seeking to be the nation's car and credit czar.</p><p>     Obama has far different ambitions. His goal is to rewrite the American social compact, to recast...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Bonfire of the Trivialities]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/03/bonfire_of_the_trivialities.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/03/bonfire_of_the_trivialities.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>     For this we are going to poison the well for any further financial rescues, face the prospect of letting AIG go under (which would make the Lehman Brothers collapse look trivial) and risk a run on the entire world financial system?</p><p>     And there is such a thing as law. The way to break a contract legally is Chapter 11. Short of that, a contract is a contract. The AIG bonuses were agreed to before the government takeover and are perfectly legal. Is the rule now that when public anger is kindled, Congress summarily cancels contracts? </p><p>     Even worse are the clever schemes now being cooked up in Congress to retrieve the money by means of some retroactive confiscatory tax....]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Morally Unserious in the Extreme]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/03/using_embryoswithout_limit.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/03/using_embryoswithout_limit.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>     I am not religious. I do not believe that personhood is conferred upon conception. But I also do not believe that a human embryo is the moral equivalent of a hangnail and deserves no more respect than an appendix. Moreover, given the protean power of embryonic manipulation, the temptation it presents to science, and the well-recorded human propensity for evil even in the pursuit of good, lines must be drawn. I suggested the bright line prohibiting the deliberate creation of human embryos solely for the instrumental purpose of research -- a clear violation of the categorical imperative not to make a human life (even if only a potential human life) a means rather than an end. </p><p> ...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Deception at Core of Obama Plans]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/03/a_dishonest_gimmicky_budget.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/03/a_dishonest_gimmicky_budget.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>     All presidents do that. But few undertake the kind of brazen deception at the heart of Obama's radically transformative economic plan, a rhetorical sleight of hand so smoothly offered that few noticed. </p><p>     The logic of Obama's address to Congress went like this:</p><p>     "Our economy did not fall into decline overnight," he averred. Indeed, it all began before the housing crisis. What did we do wrong? We are paying for past sins in three principal areas: energy, health care, and education -- importing too much oil and not finding new sources of energy (as in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and the Outer Continental Shelf?), not reforming health care, and tolerating too...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Obama Proposes a European U.S.]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/02/obama_wants_a_european_transfo.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/02/obama_wants_a_european_transfo.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>     Reagan came to office to do something: shrink government, lower taxes, rebuild American defenses. Obama made clear Tuesday night that he intends to be equally transformative. His three goals: universal health care, universal education, and a new green energy economy highly funded and regulated by government.</p><p>     (1) Obama wants to be to universal health care what Lyndon Johnson was to Medicare. Obama has publicly abandoned his once-stated preference for a single-payer system as in Canada and Britain. But that is for practical reasons. In America, you can't get there from here directly.</p><p>     Instead, Obama will create the middle step that will lead ultimately and...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA['Kick Me' Diplomacy]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/02/obama_being_tested_early_often.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/02/obama_being_tested_early_often.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p> (a) Pressuring Kyrgyzstan to shut down the U.S. air base in Manas, an absolutely crucial NATO conduit into Afghanistan.</p><p>     (b) Announcing the formation of a "rapid reaction force" with six former Soviet republics, a regional Russian-led strike force meant to reassert Russian hegemony in the Muslim belt north of Afghanistan.</p><p>     (c) Planning to establish a Black Sea naval base in Georgia's breakaway province of Abkhazia, conquered by Moscow last summer.</p><p>     (d) Declaring Russia's intention to deploy offensive Iskander missiles in Kaliningrad if Poland and the Czech Republic go ahead with plans to station an American (anti-Iranian) missile defense system.</p><p>    ...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Iraq: Good News Is No News]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/02/iraq_us_win_big_in_iraqi_elect.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/02/iraq_us_win_big_in_iraqi_elect.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>    Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki went from leader of a small Islamic party to leader of the "State of the Law Party," campaigning on security and secular nationalism. He won a smashing victory. His chief rival, a more sectarian and pro-Iranian Shiite religious party, was devastated. Another major Islamic party, the pro-Iranian Sadr faction, went from 11 percent of the vote to 3 percent, losing badly in its stronghold of Baghdad. The Islamic Fadhila party that had dominated Basra was almost wiped out. </p><p>     The once-dominant Sunni party affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood and the erstwhile insurgency was badly set back. New grass-roots tribal ("Awakening") and secular Sunni...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[So Much For Hope Over Fear]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/02/obamas_shine_wears_off_faster.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/02/obamas_shine_wears_off_faster.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>     The Daschle affair was more serious because his offense involved more than taxes. As Michael Kinsley once observed, in Washington the real scandal isn't what's illegal, but what's legal. Not paying taxes is one thing. But what made this case intolerable was the perfectly legal dealings that amassed Daschle $5.2 million in just two years.</p><p>  He'd been getting $1 million per year from a law firm. But he's not a lawyer, nor a registered lobbyist. You don't get paid this kind of money to instruct partners on the Senate markup process. You get it for picking up the phone and peddling influence. </p><p>     At least Tim Geithner, the tax-challenged Treasury secretary, had been...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Obama's Unnecessary Apology]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/01/us_respected_and_bled_for_musl.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/01/us_respected_and_bled_for_musl.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>     Astonishing. In these most recent 20 years -- the alleged winter of our disrespect of the Islamic world -- America did not just respect Muslims, it bled for them. It engaged in five military campaigns, every one of which involved -- and resulted in -- the liberation of a Muslim people: Bosnia, Kosovo, Kuwait, Afghanistan and Iraq.</p><p>     The two Balkan interventions -- as well as the failed 1992-93 Somali intervention to feed starving African Muslims (43 Americans were killed) -- were humanitarian exercises of the highest order, there being no significant U.S. strategic interest at stake. In these 20 years, this nation has done more for suffering and oppressed Muslims than any...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Obama's Inaugural Surprise]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/01/obama_a_complicated_man.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/01/obama_a_complicated_man.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>     Which seems to me the only way to understand the mediocrity of his inaugural address. The language lacked lyricism. The content had neither arc nor theme: no narrative trajectory like Lincoln's second inaugural; no central idea, as was (to take a lesser example) universal freedom in Bush's second inaugural.</p><p>     This is odd because Obama is so clearly capable of more. But he decisively left behind the candidate who made audiences swoon and the impressionable faint. And that left the million-plus on the Mall, while unshakably euphoric about the moment, let down and puzzled by the speech. He'd given them nothing to cheer or chant, nothing to sing.</p><p>     Candidate Obama had...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Exit Bush, Shoes Flying]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/01/obamas_revises_the_bush_years.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/01/obamas_revises_the_bush_years.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>     It is the repeated pledge to conduct a withdrawal from Iraq that does not destabilize its new democracy and that, as Vice President-elect Joe Biden said just this week in Baghdad, adheres to the Bush-negotiated status of forces agreement that envisions a U.S. withdrawal over three years, not the 16-month timetable on which Obama campaigned.</p><p>     It is the great care Obama is taking in not pre-emptively abandoning the anti-terror infrastructure that the Bush administration leaves behind. While still a candidate, Obama voted for the expanded presidential wiretapping (FISA) powers that Bush had fervently pursued. And while Obama opposes waterboarding (already banned, by the way,...]]></description>
				</item>
   </channel>
</rss>