April
20, 2005
The China Mess
By Lawrence
Kudlow
There’s
a lot of bad political and economic blood developing between China
and Japan, and China and the U.S. None of it is going to lead
to any good.
Anti-Japanese
demonstrations have broken out in Shanghai and Hong Kong, with
Chinese authorities looking on with winks and nods. The Chinese
want Japan to apologize for aggression in the 1930s and 1940s,
although Japan has done so about forty times in recent years.
The Chinese also claim not to like Japan’s newly revised
history textbooks on the subject. Then there’s the ongoing
squabble about oil and gas reserves on some offshore islands.
But the problems
here run much deeper. China doesn’t much like the fact that
Japanese Prime Minister Koizumi is pulling his country even closer
to the U.S. in the world terror war. This renewed U.S.-Japan alliance
also implies that a free and democratic Taiwan will be protected
against Beijing’s new “anti-secession” law.
Japan is
also firm in supporting U.S. efforts to stop North Korea’s
military and nuclear buildup. China dominates North Korea, so
it could really put the pressure on Kim Jong Il to renegotiate
a nuclear agreement. But China only says it will help with the
North Korea problem and never seems to do very much.
China shows
its two faces all the time. It praised the late Pope John Paul
II upon his passing and then promptly jailed a Catholic bishop
and a priest. It has been liberalizing its economy and reforming
local government, but it is still a dictatorship without free
national elections. Though it has taken steps to join the community
of nations, it now appears to be launching a newly militant program
of nationalism. Japan is the proximate target, but one ultimately
suspects that all this is aimed at the U.S.
The U.S.,
however, isn’t helping matters by threatening to launch
a currency- and trade-protection war against China. The U.S.,
Japan, and the rest of the G-7 nations are putting the heat on
China to revalue, or “up-value,” the yuan and end
its peg to the U.S. dollar. This is allegedly to correct global
trade imbalances and stop “cheap” Chinese exports
from flooding U.S. and European markets. But any meaningful currency
adjustment would have to be a yuan revaluation of at least 25
percent. That would require significant tightening of Chinese
monetary policy, which, in turn, would cause a big slowdown in
Chinese economic growth.
Is that what
we really want?
The threat
of a currency war could be an unnoticed factor in the recent U.S.
stock market plunge. A much slower China economy would take a
percentage point or two off U.S. economic growth, especially in
areas like commodities, cyclical industries, tech, transportation,
shipping, and trucking. These are the exact market sectors that
are getting hammered on Wall Street.
Have the
U.S. Treasury, the G-7, and the IMF forgotten the recent history
of misbegotten currency manipulation? When several Asian currencies
were forced to de-link from the U.S. dollar in the 1990s, world
deflation followed. Floating exchange rates were a big mistake
then, and could be a big mistake now.
Treasury
man John Snow insists on floating rates worldwide, but he forgets
that emerging-country currencies don’t float -- they sink.
Aren’t we yet persuaded that nations cannot devalue their
way to prosperity? Or that currency stability is better than currency
chaos?
China, remember,
has a shaky banking system plagued with bad state-sponsored loans
made to failing nationalized companies. A floating yuan might
rise in the short run, but it could crash in the medium term as
foreign investors withdraw their capital flows for fear of instability.
Fortunately,
when Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice visited China recently,
she avoided any mention of forcing a currency change. But John
Snow, encouraged by Republicans, keeps pressing the unpopular
point. Where’s the policy coordination inside the U.S. government?
Protectionist
pressure on the Chinese is also rising. A trade-opening textile
agreement has resulted in a temporary burst of Chinese clothing
exports to the U.S. American clothing makers have had years to
prepare for this, but instead they’re suing the U.S. government
on so-called “anti-dumping” grounds. The Chinese government
is meanwhile accusing the U.S., and rightly so, of reneging on
the free-trade textile deal.
Why is the
U.S. threatening economic warfare against China? Currency protection
and trade protection not only blunt economic growth, they sour
international political relations. If you add in the vexing problem
of nuclear proliferation in North Korean and the historic ill-feelings
between China and Japan, you’ve got a real geopolitical
and economic mess brewing in northeast Asia. With no apparent
solution in sight.
Lawrence
Kudlow is a former Reagan economic advisor, a syndicated columnist,
and the co-host of CNBC's Kudlow
& Company.
Send
This Article to a Friend