March
11, 2005
Expect Mideast Foes Of Freedom to Stage Violent Counterattacks
By Mort
Kondracke
President
Bush's wave of democracy is sweeping the Middle East, but it simply
does not figure that the forces of despotism and darkness are
going to yield without a fight.
The counterattack
may have begun with Hezbollah's mass demonstration in Beirut on
Tuesday. Presumably, it won't stop there. Hezbollah has up to
20,000 men with arms. It blew up the U.S. Marine barracks and
the U.S. Embassy in Lebanon in 1983 and drove Israeli forces to
leave Southern Lebanon.
Moreover,
as a terrorist group, the "Party of God" has global
connections and global reach. It is aided and funded not only
by Syria but also Iran. Hezbollah killed 19 U.S. Air Force personnel
in a bombing at the Khobar Towers apartment complex in Saudi Arabia
in 1996.
It also
bombed the Israeli Embassy in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in 1992
and a Jewish community center there in 1994. It plotted an attack
on Israeli targets in Singapore in the 1990s. In 2002, two men
were convicted in North Carolina of smuggling cigarettes to raise
funds for Hezbollah.
Around the
world, "security services are not cracking down forcefully
and not paying attention to the terrorist cells and networks that
are being established internationally right under the respective
authorities' noses," said Matthew Levitt, a scholar at the
pro-Israel Washington Institute for Near East Policy. "The
mistakes that are now being made regarding Hezbollah are the same
as those made a decade ago concerning al Qaeda."
It's increasingly,
and gratifyingly, clear, as Bush said on Tuesday, that "across
the Middle East, a critical mass of events is taking that region
in a hopeful new direction."
In Afghanistan,
Iraq, Palestine and Lebanon - and even, to an extent, in Egypt,
Saudi Arabia and Iran - "it should be clear that authoritarian
rule is not the wave of the future; it is the last gasp of a discredited
past."
Is it Bush's
doing? In many quarters - though not widely, as yet, in the Democratic
Party - Bush is getting credit. His most improbable endorsement
came from Walid Jumblatt, the Lebanese Druze leader who has not
always been so friendly to the United States.
He told The
Washington Post, "It's strange for me to say it, but this
process of change has started because of the American invasion
of Iraq. I was cynical about Iraq. But when I saw the Iraqi people
voting three weeks ago, eight million of them, it was the start
of a new Arab world. The Syrian people, the Egyptian people, all
say that something is changing. The Berlin Wall has fallen. We
can see it."
It's true,
as some Bush critics say, that it was Iraq's Ayatollah Sistani
who insisted, over the United States wavering, that his country's
Jan. 30 elections be held on time. But those elections would not
have been possible without Bush's decision to topple Saddam Hussein.
It's also
true that Bush's initiative has been expensive, particularly in
lost lives, both American and Iraqi. But, if all of this really
produces a democratic Middle East, Americans surely will find
it worthwhile. Bush will go down with the late Ronald Reagan as
a historic American president.
But we're
not there yet, either on the ground or in the mind of the American
public. The latest Fox News poll asked, "With George W. Bush
as president, do you think the world is generally heading in a
better direction or a worse direction?" The answer was, "better,"
41 percent, "worse," 43 percent.
But if the
progress toward freedom continues and Bush gets credit for it,
those numbers will change. And chances are, Democratic doubters
will be swamped in the process.
So too the
Republican "realists," who never believed that democracy
could prevail in the Mideast - or even in Eastern Europe, for
that matter - and that "stability" was the best goal
of U.S. foreign policy.
The "Bush
Doctrine" holds that the way to fight terrorism, and, to
build support for the United States, is for this country to support
the popular yearning for self-government and prosperity and to
oppose authoritarianism, even when it's practiced by ostensible
U.S. allies like Egypt's Hosni Mubarak and the Saudi Royal family.
But there
remain three big obstacles to the triumph of the Bush Doctrine.
One is the sheer difficulty of embedding democracy in Middle East
cultures that have never known it. The second is the possibility
that democracy will be short-lived, as it has been in Russia,
with popular rule quickly giving way to renewed dictatorship,
and possibly Islamic extremism. And the third is the resistance
of those who have everything to lose if democracy succeeds.
In Iraq,
those forces, Saddamists and Islamists, are committing mayhem
every day to prevent a stable government from taking hold.
It's hard
to believe that Syria, Iran and the terrorist forces they aid
- Hezbollah, al Qaeda, Islamic Jihad, Hamas and the rest - will
let themselves be blown away by the forces of freedom.
Under pressure
from the Lebanese population and the world community, Syria is
hoping that it can get away with a redeployment of its forces
in Lebanon, not a total withdrawal. It's hoping that Hezbollah's
demonstrations will be taken as a sign that Lebanese Shiites,
at least, don't want full withdrawal.
Fortunately,
that's not likely to work. France, Saudi Arabia and the United
Nations are joining the United States in calling for a full withdrawal.
And foreigners have the power to inflict serious damage on Syria's
decrepit economy if it does not comply.
Hezbollah
may not be able to keep Syrian forces in Lebanon. But it could
try by staging attacks against Israel, hoping that retaliation
might divert the world's pressure. Bush seemed to be trying to
pre-empt such a tactic by pointing out Tuesday that the latest
terror bombing in Tel Aviv was carried out by a radical Palestinian
group headquartered in Damascus.
It will be
a major test of international resolve whether Europe and the United
Nations join the United States in demanding Hezbollah's disarmament.
So far, Europe does not list Hezbollah as a terrorist group.
Conceivably,
Hezbollah might "go political"- compete in Lebanon's
May elections, bid to become the single most influential party
in the country's parliament and, ultimately, try to turn Lebanon
into an Islamic state allied with Iran and at war with Israel.
Under Bush,
the most powerful nation on earth is at last fully committed to
the cause of freedom. It is a historic act of leadership. It is
making a difference. But freedom has enemies. They have weapons.
Before this fight is over, they are likely to use them.
Mort
Kondracke is the Executive Editor of Roll Call.
Send
This Page to a Friend