The amazing part
of the great Danish cartoon caper isn't that Muslims immediately
engage in acts of mob violence when things don't go their way.
That is de rigueur for the Religion of Peace. Their immediate
response to all bad news is mass violence. That's a "dog
bites man" story and belongs on page B-34, next to the grade
school hot lunch menu and the birth notices.
After an Egyptian
ferry capsized recently, killing hundreds of passengers, a whole
braying mob of passengers' relatives staged an organized attack
on the company, throwing furniture out the window and burning
the building to the ground. Witnesses say it was the most violent
ocean liner-related incident since Carnival Cruise Lines fired
Kathie Lee Gifford.
The "offense
to Islam" ruse is merely an excuse for Muslims to revert
to their default mode: rioting and setting things on fire. These
people have a serious anger management problem.
So it's not exactly
a scoop that Muslims are engaging in violence. A front-page story
would be "Offended Muslims Remain Calm."
What is stunning about
this spectacle is that their violence is working. With a few exceptions,
the media won't show the cartoons that incited mass violence around
the globe (cartoons available at www.anncoulter.com). And yet,
week after week, American patriots endure "The Boondocks"
without complaint. Where's the justice here?
Perhaps we could put
aside our national, ongoing, post-9/11 Muslim butt-kissing contest
and get on with the business at hand: Bombing Syria back to the
stone age and then permanently disarming Iran.
The mass
violence by Muslims over some cartoons reminds us why we have
to worry when countries like Iran start talking about having nukes.
Iran is led by a lunatic who makes a big point of denying the
Holocaust. Indeed, in response to the Muhammad cartoons, one Iranian
newspaper is soliciting cartoons about the Holocaust. (So far
the only submissions have come from Ted Rall, Garry Trudeau and
The New York Times.)
Iran is certainly
implying that it has nukes. Maybe they do, maybe they don't, but
you can't take chances with berserk psychotics. What if they start
having one of these bipolar episodes with a nuclear bomb?
If you don't want
to get shot by the police, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, then don't point
a toy gun at them. Or, as I believe our motto should be after
9/11: Jihad monkey talks tough; jihad monkey takes the consequences.
Sorry, I realize that's offensive. How about "camel jockey"?
What? Now what'd I say? Boy, you tent merchants sure are touchy.
Grow up, would you?
In addition, I believe
we are legally required to be bombing Syria right now. And unlike
the Quran's alleged prohibition on depictions of Muhammad, I've
got documentation to back that up!
Muslims in Syria torched
the Danish Embassy a few weeks ago, burning it to the ground.
According to everyone, the Syrian government was behind the attack
-- the prime minister of Denmark, Condoleezza Rice and White House
spokesman Scott McClellan. I think even the gals on "The
View" have acknowledged that Damascus was behind this one.
McClellan said: "We
will hold Syria responsible for such violent demonstrations since
they do not take place in that country without government knowledge
and support."
We are signatories
to a treaty that requires us to do more than "hold Syria
responsible" for this attack. Syria has staged a state-sponsored
attack on our NATO partner on Danish soil, the Danish embassy.
According to the terms of the NATO treaty, the United States and
most of Europe have an obligation to go to war with Syria.
Or is NATO -- like
the conventions of civilized behavior, personal hygiene and grooming
-- inapplicable when Muslims are involved? Liberals complain about
"unilateral action," but under the terms of a treaty
created by Dean Acheson and the Democrats, France, Germany, Spain
and Greece are all obliged to go to war with us against Syria.
Why, it's almost like a coalition! OK, Mr. Commie: Saddle up!
Copyright
2006 Ann Coulter
Distributed
by Universal Press Syndicate
