November 10, 2005
Danny Ocean Defends the Rather Network By Ann Coulter
The most cosseted, self-indulgent, worthless people in the universe
are worried their suffering has been downgraded. For 50 years Hollywood
drama queens have churned out plays, movies, TV shows, books, poems,
allegories, museum exhibits, personal testimonials, dioramas, interpretive
dances, wood carvings, cave paintings, needlepoint wall hangings
and scatological limericks about their victimization at the hands
of a brute named Joe McCarthy. Schoolchildren who will learn nothing
about George Washington, Thomas Edison or Paul Revere are forced
to read chapter and verse about the black night of fascism (BNOF)
under McCarthy.
But half a century of myth-making later, one little book comes out
and gives the contrary view -- and Hollywood thinks it's Treblinka.
George Clooney, writer and director of the rebuttal, claims he was
driven to make the movie "Good Night, and Good Luck" because "a
book came out about how great McCarthy was."
Q: Ann Coulter's "Treason"?
GC: Yes.
Needless to say I was shocked to learn that George Clooney can read.
Liberals haven't been so shocked by a book since "Uncle Tom's Cabin."
So, apparently, we must revisit the BNOF under McCarthy one more
time. (Ethical dilemma: Would you write a book to set the record
straight on Joseph McCarthy knowing that it might give rise to yet
another lame George Clooney movie?)
Clooney said of his small contribution to the "McCarthyism" industry:
"I realized that we had to be incredibly careful with the facts,
because if we got any of them wrong, they could say it's all horse****.
So I had to double-source every scene."
I don't intend to see his movie because -- except for the McCarthy
parts -- it sounds like a snoozefest. (Half the reviewers so far
have said "good night" to Clooney, and the other half have said
"good luck.") And despite all those "double-sources," in addition
to getting the big facts wrong (about America and about the Soviet
Union), Clooney got all the little facts wrong, too. I guess he
borrowed some of Al Franken's "fact-checkers."
As even liberal reviewers have noted, it was hardly an act of bravery
for Edward R. Murrow to attack McCarthy. TheNew York
Times was attacking McCarthy, TheNew York Post
was attacking McCarthy and The Washington Post was attacking
McCarthy. Every known news outlet was attacking McCarthy. McCarthy
was in a pitched battle for his life, his career and the fate of
the nation. Murrow merely jumped on the liberal bandwagon -- and
rather late in the game. (You want bravery? Try sitting all the
way through "Solaris.")
I gather the movie's two examples of McCarthy's perfidy are the
cases of Annie Lee Moss and Milo Radulovich. As described in detail
on Pages 62-64 of "Treason," Moss was a proved Communist Party member
-- who happened to be working in the Code Room of the Pentagon.
It was an act of sheer madness, like, say, putting a member of al-Qaida
at the Pentagon today or putting Pat Leahy on the Senate Judiciary
Committee. Oh wait ...
Moss put on a big Amos 'n' Andy show for a Senate committee, delighting
racist liberals who happily proclaimed Moss too simpleminded to
be a communist. Only thanks to McCarthy, who ignored the barrage
of calumnies from liberals, Moss was moved to a less sensitive position
at the Pentagon.
As for Milo Radulovich, he had absolutely nothing to do with McCarthy.
McCarthy never mentioned his name. So maybe liberals have finally
found the one liberal in the '50s who was not on the payroll of
the Soviet Union. I don't know and I don't care.
Amusingly, Clooney said in an interview that Alger Hiss was "probably"
a communist spy. By now, I believe even the Nation magazine
has been forced to admit Hiss was more than that. But, Clooney says,
the point is McCarthy "was wrong about 99 percent of them."
If McCarthy was "wrong about 99 percent of them," when are we going
to get a movie about one of the 99 percent? I might go see that
movie.
Clooney reverts to the standard Hollywood talking point, saying:
"(M)ore important than that, (McCarthy) was wrong every time he
denied people their civil liberties."
Ah yes, the old civil liberties canard. Apparently, the only period
worse than the BNOF under McCarthy is the current BNOF under President
George Bush. This was followed by the usual number of specific examples
of civil liberties that had been denied: zero. Liberals churn out
hysterical slander daily, but insist on acting like they are the
ones under attack.
The only people being tortured are those of us forced to endure
the egos of Hollywood fantasists who profess left-wing views to
prove they are deep thinkers. Come to think of it, the current BNOF
is a lot like the original BNOF under McCarthy.
