Thursday,
February 3 2005
THE SOTU AND THE SUPERBOWL: I'm not going to bore
you with a review of the speech last night - the President
finished just over 14 hours ago and there's already been
enough commentary written about it to choke a horse. Instead,
I'll bore you with something completely different.
My
first thought after Bush finished speaking last night was,
"he did it again." Did what again, you ask? "Outperformed
expectations" and "delivered a strong performance"
are two of the most commonly heard cliches.
But
then it occurred to me how silly it was to think in those
terms. Bush ALWAYS delivers. In fact, with the exception
of the first presidential debate last year I can't think
of another example when Bush didn't come through in big
moments. And he's faced more than his share of big moments
over the last four years.
Now switch gears with me and
think about the Superbowl. Think about the players who will
be taking the field this Sunday. If you had to pick a player
who reminded you most of President Bush and the way he conducts
himself, who would it be? It seems to me the
answer is so obvious it verges on making the question
rhetorical.
Tom
Brady isn't the most physically gifted player around. He's
not flashy. He wasn't very highly regarded coming out of
college (in the 2000 draft, no less). But he's a tremendous
leader, a relentless competitor, and a ruthlessly disciplined
and consistent player. He has developed into the league's
best quarterback and even at the tender age of 27 he's already
cemented his position as a first-ballot Hall of Famer.
Now, just for the sake of fun,
consider the Democrats. Which players would they represent?
The answer isn't very obvious at all. Harry Reid, who I'm
sure is a very nice man, doesn't look like he should be
on the field at all - unless he was a referee or a member
of the chain gang.
Best case scenario for Howard
Dean would be to see him as a John Gruden-type coach roaming
the sidelines. Worse case Dean is a face-painted fan in
the 36th row who keeps spilling his beer onto the people
in front of him while ranting about how dirty the other
team is.
Ted
Kennedy? John Kerry? Nancy Pelosi? I don't have a clue.
Hillary Clinton is currently the only figure in the party
with the substance and smarts to be competitive, but at
the moment she seems to be reading from a different playbook
than a lot of other players on the team.
Now,
I fully admit this post falls in the category of "not
very serious", but I've been sick for nearly a week
and frankly I'm not in the mood. But I do think this silliness
is illustrative of a larger, relevant point: right now the
Democrats simply do not have anyone with enough stature
and charisma to compete on the national level with this
President. Last night was just one more example of that
fact.
To
go back to the analogy one last time, the Democrats are
a team without a coach and without any star players. Meanwhile,
on the other side, George W. Bush just keeps moving the
ball down the field and scoring touchdowns. -
T. Bevan 11:35 am Link
| Email |
Send
to a Friend