November 27, 2009

Playing by Reid's Rules on Filibusters

Sen. Jeff Sessions, Washington Post

Send to a Friend

Legal scholars have long debated whether the filibuster may be used to keep judicial nominees off the bench. For practical purposes, that question was answered on May 23, 2005. That night, while forging a settlement of a boiling debate, the bipartisan "Gang of 14" established that filibustering judges is allowed, but only under "extraordinary circumstances."

This controversy arose when Democratic senators met at a strategy retreat shortly after President George W. Bush took office. There, they made a calculated and historic decision to cast aside more than 200 years of Senate precedent and to openly and systematically filibuster even highly qualified Bush nominees.

Uproar ensued, leading to contentious debate and even an all-night Senate session....

Read Full Article ››

TAGGED: judicial nominees, Supreme Court

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

November 18, 2009
GOP Flip-Flop on Judicial Filibusters
Dana Milbank, Washington Post
In their quest to thwart President Obama, Republicans do not fear the hobgoblin of consistency.For much of this decade, Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, now the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, led the fight against... more ››
November 19, 2009
2 Years Later: Revisiting New London
Froma Harrop, Providence Journal
Amtrak riders passing through New London, Conn., can catch an odd sight in an otherwise picturesque New England setting: a fancy corporate center standing next to a street grid emptied of nearly all its buildings. This used to be... more ››
Twenty-two states prohibit direct corporate spending in state candidate elections, including eight that allow union donations:States that prohibit corporate and union donations: Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Michigan, North... more ››